From the Egypt State Information Service (FULL ARTICLE)

The head of the Supreme Council of Antiquities on Thursday 20/8/2009 unveiled restoration work under way at one of Egypt’s most famous synagogues, a project he denied was meant to assuage Jewish anger at the country’s culture minister.

The Egyptian government has rallied around Culture Minister Farouk Honsni, but Zahi Hawwas, the head of the Council said the decision to restore the Moses Ben Maimon Synagogue in Cairo had nothing to do with Hosni’s candidacy.

“I believe these rumors were started to harm Hosni’s bid to become the next director general of the UNESCO,” said Hawwas. “The Jewish monuments are Egyptian monuments … they are part of us and part of our culture”, he said

He added that the Ministry spends L.E. 700m annually on the restoration and development of archaeological sites, especially the ones which were damaged after the earthquake of October 1992.

This seems to be part of a trend I’ve noticed over the last 18 months or so, highlighting SCA work on post – Pharaonic sites, such as the Rosetta Museum (highlighting the Ottoman heritage in the city), the rebuild of the Abu Haggag mosque in Luxor and the long term Islamic Cairo projects, the last of which was first mooted back in the early 2000′s, but has only recently really begun to make an widely publicised impact.

It will be interesting to see how this develops, and whether this will mean a long term broadening of the SCA’s focus, and the implications of that for Pharaonic era monuments and artifacts.

This week, from the birthplace of Egyptology, the zenith of Pharaonic art…

This weeks video, examining the sarcophagus of Nectanebo II (Cat. No. EA10) in the Egyptian Sculpture Gallery at the British Museum. I have wanted to make a piece on the sarcophagus for this blog for a long time now, as I feel it’s historical importance is often overlooked, as marking the end of an era, and in some ways an entire culture. I’ve always found this piece to be profoundly moving.

To practicalities, I do apologise in advance for the rather poor delivery on this video, as I had about 10 minutes to mentally go through the presentation before plunging in.  C’est la vie!

Next week, the video shall not feature an object from the British Museum collection, but somewhere else, whose collection is completely and utterly new for me, having never visited the institution in question before in my life.  It’s a very exciting time for me!

I’ve written on here before concerning the exceedingly black image that most of contemporary society has of Ancient Egypt. A lot of these views are based on old stereotypes from Hollywood, the press hysteria over the “Mummy’s Curse” surrounding the tomb of Tutankhamun (a.k.a. “King Tut”) and views based on the myths and folktales of an entirely different culture (I.e. Exodus).

Archaeology and study of Egyptian literature and administrative documents long ago dispelled these black myths, but the public perception lingers. This may be because that much of work done in translation and excavation is published in journals and books that are largely inaccessible and undesirable to the general public because of it’s highly academic nature, and many of the specialist publications are also not available in more general bookstores. Meanwhile increasing amounts of information come from TV, whose study of Egyptian culture is limited to Hollywood blockbusters or embarrassingly bad “edutainment” documentaries that focus on the sensational.

However, what good is research if it’s huge advances in understanding utterly pass by the general population, whom still cling the notions of the sneering Pharaoh keeping his slaves in line with the lash?

I am interested in getting some views and comments on this, so please debate!

An Egyptian friend of mine recently posted an article concerning the god Anubis and his view that the depiction of the god as a black canine, commonly held to be a jackal may be a Xoloitzcuintli (commonly known as a Xolo), a breed of hairless dog indigenous to Meso-America.

He responded to my comments with this article, and out of respect to the trouble he has taken with such a reply, I wish to address the points that he has raised, and also to put forward my argument for the “Jackal Theory”. However, before I do so, I must admit to having no official expertise in either Egyptology or Pre-Columbian Meso-American religions. Contrary to my friends touching compliment, I am not an Egyptologist, merely a student of the subject, who harbours hopes of one day holding such an honour. That said, let’s begin.

The fact that the Xolo is native to the Americas is not disputed here, rather my friend points to the possibility for Pre-Columbian transatlantic travel, and the recent attempts to cross the Atlantic on a reed built vessel, christened the “Ra II”. This vessel was actually built in Latin America by Bolivians, but was built using technology easily within the capabilities of the Egyptians. It sailed from Morocco to Barbados successfully, captained by Thor Heyerdahl. This, combined with the apparent existence of nicotine in some Pharaonic era mummies and similarities of Anubis to gods worshipped in Meso-America form the basis of this argument. Let us first examine these, before proceeding to my arguments in favour of the “Jackal Theory”

Ancient Egyptian Naval Capabilities

Where the Ancient Egyptians capable of crossing the Atlantic? These days it is widely agreed that pre-Columbian contact with North America had been made by the Viking civilization, so the idea of earlier contact must likewise be given serious thought.

The Egyptians lacked the magnetic compass, but were perfectly at ease with astronomy, and were also skilled boat builders. In fact, Egyptian boat building skill extended beyond the design of Heyerdahl’s “Ra II”. The kbnt ships that Egypt used for trading overseas were built using Lebanese timber[i] and, according to the report of the Third Intermediate Period official, Wenamun, were capable of surviving storms quite well[ii]

So in answer to the question, with their technology would crossing the Atlantic have been physically possible, I would say, yes. After all it is physically possible to row across the Atlantic, if you so wish, and are sufficiently determined. The question therefore is, did they?

On this the evidence is not so good. There are no Egyptian accounts of any trans-Atlantic missions. There are no records of any contacts with any people there, nor of any exotic goods that they surely would have brought back with them. It must be remembered and emphasised that Pharaonic Egypt had a very highly developed state structure that kept records of large transactions, trade missions and military campaigns. Individual Pharaohs also used such missions as propaganda opportunities, as can be seen at Deir El Bhari with Hatshepsut’s expedition to Punt. If such a relatively short journey requires a colonnade to itself, it is hard to imagine that a trip to the Americas doesn’t warrant a single mention on any temple wall, in any officials tomb, in any folk record, in any papyri, or even in any tales handed down and recorded by classical authors.

If the Egyptians conquered a new land, they were uncharacteristically modest in recording their truly outstanding victories against both the elements and the enemy, and never spoke of the exotic produce they were sure to have brought back. Neither did they leave behind a stela, or any inscription, at their destination.

Punt Colonade, Deir El Bahri. By the author.

Nicotine in Egyptian Mummies

The only published study on this matter is that undertaken by Institut für Anthropologie und Humangenetik, Munich[iii] . Findings from this study remain controversial and ultimately inconclusive. The signature of the nicotine found in the bodies does not point specifically to the tobacco plant, rather only to the family to which it belongs, the Solanaceae family. The Mandrake plant also belongs to this same family, and was widely used by the Egyptians. It is attested to in medical papyri[iv], and has anaesthetic properties as well as narcotic. Other plants used in folk medicine also belong to this same family.

In addition it should be noted that only a single intact mummy was involved in the tests, and no details concerning the exact provenance of the mummy, and other incomplete human remains used in the study, has not, to the best of my knowledge, been provided.

Without a strong provenance, it is impossible to know for certain whether or not these bodies have been contaminated, and in the case of the parts, or even the whole mummy, whether or not they are genuine or fakes from a later period. Excavation techniques in the 19th and early 20th centuries were not conducted in the same manner as the “forensically aware” techniques of the current era, and modern contamination is also possible. The possibility of tomb robbery as the ultimate source of some of these parts cannot be completely discounted either.

Similarity of Anubis to Meso-American Gods

The nearest likeness to Anubis I have been able to locate in Meso-American religions is the Aztec god Xolotl, hence the name Xoloitzcuintli, or Xolo, for the breed of dog that is being linked to Anubis.

Xolotl. Wikimedia Commons

A brief look a chronology is important here. Anubis is one of the older gods of the Egyptian pantheon. Figurines in his image (though without being able to be conclusively identified as representing him) go back to the Pre-Dynastic period, and he mentioned repeatedly and explicitly in Old Kingdom funerary texts[v] . This gives the birth of his cult to be some time in the late 4th or early 3rd millennium BCE, at the latest.

Aztec civilization, however, is much, much more recent. The Aztec civilization flourished from the 12th to 16th centuries CE. It’s people probably did not migrate into the central American region before the 6th century CE. Pharaonic Egypt had ceased to exist as an independent state in 30BCE, and had been ruled by a foreign dynasty since 343BCE. Had the Egyptians crossed the Atlantic at any point in Pharaonic history, they would never have met the Aztecs, nor Xolotl.

The Aztecs would not have been there to be taught of Anubis by the Egyptians. It is fortunate, for had the two met, then the Egyptians would just as surely have decimated the local population with their eastern hemisphere diseases, just as Cortez did. Indeed, had the contact occurred, Cortez may have found his contact had much less influence on the natives, who would by that time developed the same immunities as his own people. The Vikings, it should be noted here, made no contact with the Aztecs, landing thousands of miles to the north.

Xolotl shares certain traits, besides his canine imagery, with Anubis. Both are guides of the dead. But whilst Anubis has his role end here and upon the embalming table, and is otherwise a relatively minor god in the great scheme of things, Xolotl is a major figure in Aztec mythology, taking in roles associated with fire, bad luck, and guarding the sun at night in the underworld. As well as his canine forms, he could also be a mythical beast, featuring reversed feet. These are areas with which Anubis is never associated, and indeed, remind one more of Set than of Anubis.

The Jackal Theory

My arguments for the imagery of Anubis to be that of a jackal, or, perhaps, a jackal hybrid with another local canine, is based on both visual similarities, the habits and natures of the animals in keeping with the nature and role of the god, and the confirmed knowledge of, and interaction with these animals by the Ancient Egyptians.

Several canines were known in Ancient Egypt, listed below:

· The Egyptian Jackal (Canis aureus lupaster)
· The Saluki
· Several subspecies of Fox, including the Nile Fox.
· Arabian Wolf (Canis Lupus Arabs)

Of these, the Arabian Wolf is currently an endangered species due to hunting and killing by farmers. It’s current habitat within Egypt is believed to be restricted to the Sinai, but may have been wider in the past. Little research has been done.

The Anubis imagery, of which are best example comes from a statue of Anubis in fully canine form atop a shrine, found in tomb KV62 of Tutankhamun (18th. Dyn) and now in Cairo Museum depicts an all black canine, with large, pointed ears, long slender jaw and body, as shown here.

Anubis. Egypt Archive

In terms of body shape, I believe this imagery closely resembles that of the subspecies of jackal found in Egypt, Canis aureus lupaster, shown below.

Canis aureus lupaster. Unknown orignal source.

The sub-speicies of jackal known in Egypt is a desert living creature, that as well as hunting small prey can also be a scavenging carrion eater[vi]. As such, they would have been attracted to Ancient Egyptian cemeteries, were food could be found amongst the bodies of the recently deceased. They would have been particularly visible in times of epidemic. Both these factors, along with it’s living in the “dead” lands of the deserts would likely have strengthened the link between the god Anubis and the jackal.

The difference in coloration may well be the result of symbolism in Egyptian religion. There are numerous other examples of this in Egyptian imagery, including most notably, Osiris, whom is often depicted with black skin, and, like Anubis, is a deity associated with death and the afterlife[vii]. This is currently the most widely accepted view amongst experts, though there remains the possibility of the Anubis canine depiction being a hybrid wither another breed, of which I believe the most likely to be the Saluki.

Osiris depicted with black skin. Wikimedia Commons

The Saluki (sometimes confused with the Greyhound, though it’s possible both were known in Egypt) was known in Egypt from at least the time of the Old Kingdom. They are tall, athletic, slender canines with coats that can be a variety of colours, including black, with both smooth and “feathered” fur. Animals with the latter have short body hair, with long “feathers” at the tail, ears and legs. Salukis were bred for hunting, but retain the traditional canine qualities of loyalty and obedience to their perceived alpha, or pack leader, the human. They also have a tendency to “sing”, with a varying howl, when their owner is away for long periods of time, for example, if he died. Thus, with the “mourning wail” for their separated owners, their role as loyal and dutiful guides to living creatures out in the deserts, alongside the similarly canine jackals, it is feasible that the Saluki would be a likely candidate, given their role, nature and appearance, to be part of a hybrid imagery for Anubis.

Feather coated Saluki. Wikimedia Commons

Conclusions

Given the above arguments, my personal conclusions are that the cult of Anubis grew up in Pre or Early Dynastic Egypt, and the iconography of the god is a natural product of the Ancient Egyptian view of life and death. Factors such as the sterility and inhospitable nature of the desert to humans, contrasting with it’s suitability for the carrion eating jackal make sharp symbolism that would be as clear to a modern eye as to ancient ones.

The symbolism of black in association with both death and rebirth are quite clear, in terms of both the long standing Egyptian solar tradition (day as opposed balanced by night, living balanced by after living, the transition from one to the other occurring in the west, beyond the valley) and also, as it would appear in the cult of Osiris, with it’s emphasis life coming anew from the black soil.

I do not dismiss the possibility that the Anubis canine could be a hybrid of a jackal with the desert hunting Saluki, for which some Egyptians would depend upon for hunting, guidance and possibly protection in the “dead” lands of the Western Desert.
I do not feel that Anubis bears anything beyond surface similarities to much later canine cults of Meso-America. Aside from the total silence of the Egyptians concerning the American continent, and the fundamental differences between Xolotl and Abubis, the chronological differences involved further rule out the possibility of links.

Is this a Euro-Centric view? I do not think so. I think subscribing to the idea that the Meso-American civilizations developed independently of those of the Ancient Near East does nothing to demean either family of civilizations. Egypt remains, to me, in many ways, the most remarkable of all civilizations, as the first large nation-state in history.

My view that she did not give birth to Meso-American civilization does nothing to dent those achievements, whilst the development of another family of sophisticated civilizations in Meso-America is perhaps testament to the fact that, as humans, even when separated by vast distances, times and conditions, we all aspire to harmonious, lawful, organised societies. A thought which I find most heartening.

Notes:

1 David, Rosalie: Handbook to Life in Ancient Egypt
11 Lichtheim: Ancient Egyptian Literature Vol. II “Report of Wenamun”
111Published in Naturwissenschaften, Vol 79, #8, August 1992
1V Papyrus Hearst
V  Wilkinson, Complete Gods and Goddesses of Ancient Egypt
V1 University of Michigan, Museum of Zoology website (Link)
V11 Wilkinson, Complete Gods and Goddesses of Ancient Egypt

From Al Ahram Weekly – Original Article

Will Egypt build the first offshore underwater museum? Nevine El-Aref investigates

Setting up an offshore, submarine archaeological site anywhere is not an easy task, let alone in a city with the water pollution problems of Alexandria. Yet the remarkable discoveries made by underwater archaeologists over the last decade justify further serious efforts for what would be Egypt’s first ever offshore underwater museum.

The site and form gives cause for conjecture. Should it be in Alexandria’s Eastern Harbour, the Sisila area, or Abu Qir Bay? What will it look like? Should it resemble the Australian National Maritime Museum in Sydney or the Bodrum Museum of Underwater Archaeology at the spectacular Uluburun Wreck in Turkey, or the Musée de Marine in Paris? All these display a collection of sunken ship wrecks, flora and fauna.

These questions and more were raised at an international workshop held last week in Alexandria to discuss the feasibility of constructing such a museum. On the table were a projected ground plan, an architectural design and a programme to study the environmental conditions of Alexandria’s Mediterranean Sea and its state of marine pollution, the socio- economic problems related to the success of the underwater archaeological museum project and urban impacts. The workshop was held under the umbrella of UNESCO and the Ministry of Culture at the Alexandria Art Creativity Centre, where a multidisciplinary team of 28 international and Egyptian experts were gathered.

On the eve of the workshop participants were taken on a field visit to Alexandria’s underwater archaeological sites, and listened to a presentation by Egyptian authorities on the current situation and recent activities carried out in the Eastern Harbour and around the Qait Bey Fort. This is also one of the suggested locations for the submarine museum.

The workshop was very well organised by the Cultural Development Fund (CDF). The opening session began with a short documentary relating Alexandria’s ancient history from its inception by Alexander the Great up to modern times. Culture Minister Farouk Hosni’s speech, delivered by Zahi Hawass, secretary-general of the Supreme Council of Antiquities (SCA), revealed that the aim of the workshop was not only to study the possibility of building the world’s first ever underwater archaeological museum in Alexandria, but is also to set up international principles as a model or a pilot project for any country which wanted its own submarine museum. Singapore, China and Greece are on top of the list.

For his part, Hawass described the initiative as a “beautiful dream” for Alexandria. He told the assembled experts that he had decided four years before to stop removing all ancient objects from the seabed with the exception of coins, jewellery and small artefacts that were vulnerable to looting.

“Hence, it is about time to think about an underwater museum to make such magnificent monuments accessible and visible to all,” he said.

If it happens, it’d be a incredible show, but I dread to think of the cost, let alone the conservation and engineering headaches a project like this would entail. Also, it opens up some interesting ideas. It states in the article that the larger artefacts wouldn’t be moved form their current location. Since museums function as conservation, archive and study centres for artefacts, this would seem to be taking the traditional idea of a “safehouse” of historical artefacts for future generations in a whole new direction. It raises some interesting questions. I’ll be watching this with quite some interest. Either way, less sewage in the bays of Alex is good news all round, for archaeology, for marine life and city residents alike.

Febuary 2008, Luxor

Today was a chance to revisit one of my favourite of all sites in Egypt, the Ramesseum. It is the perfect site for first time independent travellers to Egypt, since it is an easy site to navigate, and being built all at one point by a single ruler, easy to comprehend, and doable in a single visit, as well as being reasonably easy to get to.

The Ramesseum is an oasis of calm. More than any other place on the West Bank, it gives the impression of being a true mortuary temple, a memorial. The minute you turn off the road and pass the tiny ticket collection booth you forget about the world outside. It’s location at the edge of the fertile strip is both a blessing and a curse. A few trees grow here, providing colour, shade and life.

The House of Millions of Years of User-Ma’at-Ra Setep-En-Ra That Unites with Thebes in the Domain of Amun (or, “The Ramesseum” as it’s, thankfully, also known) has, by Egyptian standards, a relatively simple history. Built by Ramesses II in the 19th Dynasty (New Kingdom) as his mortuary temple and monument, the remains of today give only a hint of the splendour of the original. The temple was begun in the 2nd year of his reign, and took two decades to complete. The architects were Penra of Coptos (modern Qift, Egyptian Gebtu) and Amunemone of Abydos (Egyptian, Abdju). It was a splendid monument that matched it’s splendid name. Hard though it is to imagine, this quiet, secluded “backwater” temple would have been one of the grandest on the West bank. Only Medinet Habu (not yet built at this point) and Amunhotep III’s now sadly destroyed temple would rival it.

However, just like Amunhotep III’s temple, the Ramesseum’s life as a working temple would be sadly brief. By the Third Intermediate Period the temple cult, it seems, was no longer maintained, and the magazines were being used as a necropolis, and several burials of the priesthood have, and continue to be, discovered here.

During the Ptolemaic Period, stone and columns were plundered from the temple to build additions to the Small Temple at Medinet Habu, and in the 1st century CE the heart of the temple itself was converted into a Christian church. The Christians attacked many of the surviving wall carvings, hacking out some details, and adding carved graffiti, an act which would be repeated on numerous occasions by later explorers, whose names are now visible, particularly on the rear surviving wall of the Hypostyle hall. During the Roman/Byzantine period, an earthquake struck the Theban area, causing further destruction when, amongst other catastrophes, the colossal statues of Ramesses fell, destroying the second pylon as it did so, and breaking into the “shattered visage” beloved of Shelley. The temple’s subsequent history, following it’s final abandonment is summed up well by Richard Wilkinson.

“For centuries thereafter the Ramesseum remain a cluttered, broken and puzzling – if romantic – ruin, as impressive for the incredible destruction wrought upon it as for it’s surviving monuments”

Today, only limited reconstruction has been undertaken at the site, and it retains it’s broken and puzzling, if romantic air, especially given that relatively few visitors come or linger here, hurried past it’s tranquil ruins by tour guides to the spectacular setting of Dier El Bahri and elsewhere.

The damaged nature of the site, and the poorly designed modern approach from the North Eastern corner of the complex does nothing to dent it’s wonderful atmosphere . The solitude the site offers, the beauty of it’s surroundings and the temple itself all contribute to one of the most pleasant experiences one can have in Egypt.

Many people, not least Shelley himself, who wrote of this very place, find Egyptian temples overwhelming. Vast edifices, designed, in their eyes, to instil awe, fear and terror of the living gods who built them, into the hearts of lesser beings, the “sneer of cold command” reaching out from every statue. Shelley, however, never visited the Ramesseum. Indeed, he never visited Egypt at all. Had he done so, perhaps he would have found a place rather more like the one I have, a world away from the trunkless legs of stone that he imagined.

I have always found, from my childhood to the present day, Egyptian temples to some of the most welcoming structures. Entering the Ramsseum leaves one with a feeling of being welcomed home by a loving relative after a long trip. A place not of ecstatic joy, but of a reassuring warmth, welcome, tranquility and relaxation. It is everything one could ask for and want in any religious building.

And what of that famous colossus? It still lies where it fell so many centuries ago, the face, larger than my person, beautifully carved in granite, with serene, confident, gently smiling features. With the notable exception of the Middle Kingdom rulers, the Pharaoh’s of Egypt are invariably portrayed with that supreme confidence in their own quasi-divinity and gentle smile, even when smiting a horde of Nubians/Libyans/Sea People/Asiatics/Bedouin.

Modern visitors to the Ramesseum enter the site from it’s North Eastern corner, past a small wooden ticket collection and security kiosk, and down a sloping path past the ongoing excavations of Amunhotep II’s mortuary temple (no standing remains, no access permitted), entering into the temple proper at the ruined first courtyard. Like so many temples, this is a less than ideal approach, for the full impact of approaching up to, and then through the pylon is lost.

The pylon itself is missed by most of the relatively few visitors the temple does receive, for it lies across uneven, salty ground with small yet very spiky grasses. However a visit is recommended, both to appreciate some of the battle scenes (Kadesh, naturally) depicted on it’s western (inner) face and also it’s precarious position. As even a brief glance at the ground will quickly reveal, salt corrosion and the water table are both serious enemies which the temple faces. Large holes and pits can be seen at the foot of the pylon, damp and sometimes even part filled with water, further rotting it’s already damaged foundations. The pylon itself is visibly leaning and skewed (having already survived the major earthquake that shattered the colossi) and the doorway has now been (rather crudely) blocked up, assumeably to prevent it’s collapse.

Across the courtyard are the ground level remains of the southern wall and a part of the palace that once adjoined the temple, and was fronted by a columned portico of which only the bases now remain. On the northern side, beside the entrance path are some stored carved blocks, with some amusing and well executed details of processions and the like. The lack of any surviving paving in the courtyard, and the lonely nature of the pylon leave one with the feeling of the area having always been open, though it was originally enclosed by the Pylon on the east, porticos on the north and south, and a second pylon, fronted by the colossus, in the west.

The western side of the courtyard is the instant draw for most visitors, dominated by the fallen colossus that now straddles the mostly destroyed second pylon. In the scrub and grass around the fallen statue lie feet, hands and various parts and inscriptions, which allow you to get a close up view of the incredible finish of the work. The scale of this project really begins to hit home, and one cannot help but be humbled by the skill of the craftsmen who worked on it, giving such fine finish to a piece so large, and the engineers and overseers who had it transported so far, an installed.

The statue “Ramesses, Sun of Foreign Sovereigns” was made from a single piece of Aswan limestone was almost 70 feet high and weighed over one thousand tons. Like all Egyptian statues, it would have moved to and from a barge via sledges hauled by men. That they all pulled together in the same direction, both figuratively and literally, was quite important.

Originally a twin statue was intended for the north side of the court, though there is no evidence to suggest it was ever installed. Perhaps, for once, the ambitions of the architects exceeded their abilities, and the logistics involved in quarrying and transporting the first one all the way from Aswan were so prohibitive as to make giving it the proposed twin unviable. Time is unlikely to have been the issue, as the complex was finished less than half way into Ramesses’ reign. The colossi it seems, may have shown the Egyptians just how far they could push the bounds of bronze age logistics, even with the most superb organisation and skill. Although never receiving it’s twin, it was flanked to the other side by a statue of Ramesses’ mother, Tuya, and a subsidiary temple existed in the complex dedicated to her and his wife, Nefertari.

A flight of wooden steps leads past the fallen statue (giving a good view as they do so) and through the ruined second pylon into the second court. This feels much more like a surviving temple court, and it’s quite possible to imagine it as the enclosed courtyard it once was. In the North Eastern corner a substantial part of the colonnade remains, with a wonderful scene of the Battle of Kadesh, fairly well preserved and, with an appropriate explanation, quite easy to understand. The colonnade is fronted by Osiride statues, whose vast proportions are disguised by being proportionate to the structure as a whole.

There are two objects of particular beauty in this courtyard. The first, and perhaps one of the most photographed features of the Ramesseum, even more so than the colossos, is the beautifully head of a statue of Ramesses II, displayed where it fell, on a small plinth. The second is a reconstructed basalt feature which has a lovely traditional carving of the Pharaoh. Both depict him with the Nemes headdress, and both are subtly and finely carved in hard, beautifully finished stone, with attention to quality that it is often said is lacking in works ordered by Ramesses II. The Ramesseum, though perhaps in keeping with it’s creators taste for large scale monuments, does, however, tantalise in it’s remains, for it is clear that this was fully intended to be the crowning glory in Ramesses’ architectural legacy, and here quality appears to have been considered every bit as important as quantity.

The Western side of the second court has another surviving colonnade (again with Osiride statues), leading through into a hypostyle hall that gives the impression of a miniature Karnak. Like it’s more famous big brother, most of the roofing blocks have gone, leaving a procession of massive columns, mostly open to the sky, though here the Northern and Southern walls are also missing, giving the impression of a broad corridor rather than the hall it originally was. The Eastern wall features another battle scene, this one with a high degree of realism. Rather than the usual effortless smiting of the vile Asiatics, here we can see a real battle, with Egyptian soldiers shown fighting, and fighting hard, defending themselves against enemy onslaughts with their shields, and even taking casualties, whilst Ramesses charges the enemy in his chariot.

The Western wall features a procession of Ramesses’ sons, with their side-locks of youth. Sadly this scene is quite damaged, unlike the battle scene, though both lack the beautiful colours which are retained to a surprising degree on the columns. Despite the bird droppings and their exposure to the sun, many shades of reds, greens and blues can be seen, particularly around the capitals. It really is a most pleasant and unexpected surprise.

Beyond the Hypostyle hall is a smaller room with an intact roof which contains a 12 month calendar. It is believed to be something of a first, though, frustratingly, I have been unable to find any details concerning it, so am unable to provide any information as to exactly what makes it a first, or how to interpret it. Taking time to try and interpret it oneself is also difficult due to it’s height, and it’s position on the roof. Short of lying on the floor with a pair of opera binoculars, it is not the easiest carving to study in detail! Maybe next year I shall do just that, for I am determined to write about such a significant scene in my most beloved temple.

Beyond this bring you to the Western side of the last standing wall of the temple proper, the back of which (now open, originally a further chamber) contains scenes of a pilgrimage to Abydos and Ramesses before various deities, including Ra-Horakhty, to whom Ramesses dedicated several temples in Nubia. Although little colour remains in these scenes, the quality of the carving is good, and in the late afternoon in particular, as the sun allows shadows to return, the scenes are vivid and clear. Indeed, the late afternoon is perhaps the most beautiful time of all at this temple, and it is a lovely place to watch colour return after the bleaching sunshine of midday. In winter, it’s a lovely place to catch a sunset too, though sadly the temple closes too early to be able to spend a long, warm summer evening here.

This completes the most accessible of the standing remains of the temple. Beyond, to the North West lies the extensive and uniquely well preserved remains of the mud brick magazines, which with the barrel vaulted construction do a lot to dismiss the myth the common misconception that the arch was a Roman invention, and it’s use in Egypt goes back at least to the 3rd Dynasty.

The temple has one of the most pleasing, tranquil and reassuring atmospheres of any Egyptian site. Although it’s remains are often noted for the degree of destruction wrought upon them, it is still easy to loose oneself in the quiet shade of remains of the hypostyle hall, take in the beauty of the surroundings from the second peristyle court and relive the Battle of Kadesh upon it’s walls. As such it deserves far more time than the half or single hour devoted to it by the groups that make it this far, especially given the delightful Ramesseum Resthouse that lies next door, with it’s lush gardens and polite, quiet staff. Indeed, for those who dedicate a quiet day or half day to the site, it’s often possible, if you speak kindly to the site guards, to leave the temple to visit the resthouse, and then return on the same ticket. The owner of the resthouse is the grandson of one of the workers in Howard Carter’s team that excavated the tomb of Tutankhamun, and has a good number of photos of the personalities involved in the excavation, and some of the finds.

Overall, the Ramesseum is one of my favourite sites in all Egypt, for it’s beauty, tranquillity, welcoming, calm atmosphere. And, perhaps most of all, because it so defies the unfair and unkind words levied against it and it’s creator by a certain British poet.

Ramesseum Practicalities:
Access: Easily accessible from Luxor via the National Ferry (LE1). From here walk to the main road out of town and hail a bus (25pt flat fare) heading to the SCA Ticket Office, where you can purchase tickets. From here either walk (approx. 15 to 20 min, fine in winter, but not summer as there is no shade or shelter on the road) or take another bus, again 25pt., heading toward Gurna Ta’rif. The Ramesseum is on the right hand side of the road, along with the Ramesseum Resthouse, opposite the surviving core of Old Gurna. Note that you MUST go to the ticket office first, as no tickets are sold at the site entrance. A taxi from the ferry should cost no more than LE10, and can be arranged for a one way trip, as there are many taxis plying the road outside the temple, so getting stranded is extremely unlikely. Prices given are for March 2008.

Tickets: From the SCA ticket office, LE25 for foreign non-student adults. If you wish to go tot he resthouse, speak to the staff at the ticket barrier, as it’s usually possible ot arrange with them to be allowed re-entry. Bring pens, small notes, or something similar.

Opening Hours: 7:00am – 5:00pm (6:00pm in summer)

Facilities: None at all on site. Next door Ramesseum Resthouse has full range of drinks and a selection of (mostly light) meals for reasonable prices. As such, it’s only really necessary to bring water.

Photography: No restrictions on private photography.

From Al Ahram Weekly – Link to full article

While the SCA secretary-general was being interviewed for “Guardian’s Spotlight” in July 2008, pigeons were seen pecking away at the eyes and ear cavities of the Sphinx and their droppings were splattered on the stone. Jill Kamil discusses this new danger

The secretary-general of the Supreme Council of Antiquities had much to tell his interviewer on “Spotlight”. Zahi Hawass waxed lyrical about “exciting things” that have been happening in the field of archaeology — the discovery of a new tomb of a queen at Saqqara that has yet to be formally announced; the entrance to two tombs in the Valley of the Kings on which excavation will begin in October; and “big happenings” in Aswan, Edfu and Kom Ombo. He was enthusiastic about the “improvements” at Dendera and the Step Pyramid at Saqqara, and gave details of the new museums at Rashid, Arish, Minya and Amarna, as well as site management at Beni Hassan and Tuna Al-Gabel.

Zahi Hawass raved about the progress on the Civilisation Museum at Fustat and the Grand Egyptian Museum at Giza. Indeed, he also had much to say about the plan to upgrade the Pyramid Plateau and turn it into “a tourist-friendly and hawker-free zone”. He mentioned that the project’s security component included installing cameras, alarms and motion detectors, as well as building up a 20-kilometre fence.

I wonder if the new electronic security devices, however, while monitoring the movements of tourists and hawkers, cameleers and horse riders, will be able to pick up the unwelcome winged creatures that are finding a comfortable and shady roost in the eye and ear cavities of the Sphinx, and causing damage to the stone with their droppings. Apparently the pigeons are pecking away at this most grand and famous of monuments, finding in it an appetizing calcium meal.

Yet more focus on the Sphinx-Bird issue. Has the time come for the problem to be addressed? I am quite surprised to learn that some form of “anti-bird” measures have not been included in the Giza Plateau site management plan already, as this has been a known issue for quite some time.

From Egypt Daily News – Link to Article

CAIRO: Egyptian archaeologists have uncovered the burial chamber and coffin of King Senusret II who was believed to have ruled Egypt from 1897 BC to 1878 BC, official MENA news agency reported on Sunday.

The burial chamber was found in Al Lahun, the town built by Senusret which became Egypt’s political capital during the 12th and 13th dynasties, and where the king built his pyramid.

“The coffin is made of pink granite and the burial chamber is lined with red granite,” said Ahmed Abdel Aal, head of antiquities in Fayoum, south of Cairo.

The team also discovered “corridors and passageways inside the pyramid built to mislead thieves,” Abdel Aal said.

Wooden parts belonging to the king’s boat were also found as well as alabaster and ceramic containers decorated with hieroglyphs.

Senusret II was known for launching major irrigation projects in the Fayoum area, turning vast areas of marshland into cultivable land. –AFP

I await more news with interest, and will post anything I find, as I’m sure this has already been discovered???

From SIS – Link to original article

Culture Minister Farouk Hosni said 15/8/2008 that four statues for sphinx have been recovered in the ancient city of Luxor.

The four giant statues are made of the sand stones and were found in Luxor’s Eastern Bank.

Dr Zahi Hawwas, the Secretary General of the Supreme Council of Antiquities, said the statues were found without the upper parts.

“They were fixed upon sand-stone bases, which were brought from Aswan by the Pharaohs,” he added.

He said the bases are inscribed with the name of the founder of the 30th royal dynasty King Nekhipto.

Hawwas said he will allocate LE 100,000 to restore the discovered statues in cooperation with the Luxor’s Supreme Council chaired by Samir Farag.

The SCA is gradually clearing the entire length of the ceremonial avenue that ran between Luxor and Karnak temples, so this find isn’t surprising, as the entire length was lined with statuary. However it’s always heartening to see more late period sculpture gain attention, and that these ones will be restored.

Interestingly, a Middle East News article, carried by M&C, adds:

The team also excavated Ptolemic and Roman buildings along with a sandstone block that carries a cartouche (a royal title) of famed Queen Cleopatra, the last Ptolemaic ruler of Egypt.

Monsters & Critics

The SIS press release, however, doesn’t mention this.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.